ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
This scientific paper is supposed to come out tomorrow, so I guess I'm posting extra early. 
Pleasantries aside, this new vid by London's NHM and the corresponding scientific paper has left me quite astounded.
Saurischia now comprises of Herrerasauridae and Sauropodomorpha, but excludes Theropoda, which has closer affinities to Ornithischia, such that they form their own new monophyletic clade, Ornithoscelida.
The paper:
www.nature.com.sci-hub.cc/natu…
Pleasantries aside, this new vid by London's NHM and the corresponding scientific paper has left me quite astounded.
Saurischia now comprises of Herrerasauridae and Sauropodomorpha, but excludes Theropoda, which has closer affinities to Ornithischia, such that they form their own new monophyletic clade, Ornithoscelida.
Figure 1 | Phylogenetic relationships of early dinosaurs. Time calibrated strict consensus of 94 trees from an analysis with 73 taxa and 457 characters (see Supplementary Information). A, the least inclusive clade that includes Passer domesticus, Triceratops horridus and Diplodocus carnegii—Dinosauria, as newly defined. B, the least inclusive clade that includes P. domesticus and T. horridus—Ornithoscelida, as defined. C, the most inclusive clade that contains D. carnegii, but not T. horridus—Saurischia, as newly defined. For further information on definitions see Table 1. All subdivisions of the time periods (white and grey bands) are scaled according to their relative lengths with the exception of the Olenekian (Early Triassic), which has been expanded relative to the other subdivisions to better show the resolution within Silesauridae and among other non-dinosaurian dinosauromorphs.
The paper:
www.nature.com.sci-hub.cc/natu…
The Lion King (2019) thoughts (*SPOILERS!*)
(You've been warned)
So, I get that I've been a lazy fuck who has let his inbox ferment with unreplied comments, unseen new deviations and so forth (*cough cough* *cough cough*). I'm sorry, I was telling myself I'd get artsy and back-in business come summer, but I just haven't been feeling it (if it helps my Quora looks like this ). But alas, I will break my silence here.
Though I may never have said it explicitly, bar perhaps this piece (or maybe it goes without saying), The Lion King (1994) was a massive part of my childhood, ever since my parents bought me the DVD set for all 3 movies back in 2004, aged 4. It really nurtured my growing
A few noteworthy things
A new human species:
Black hole image:
Lion king trailer out:
Well this is ...............interesting
In my Google Scholar alerts today I found this.
It was published in the International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology on Springer's website.
It had an interesting title, so I decided to give it a read....
Turns out the author was a Pakistani creationist... who attempted to "refute" Darwin's claim that humans had evolved from other animals.
Turns out much of the information given about the history of mankind according to "evolutionists" was rather accurate, if a little dated, but there were glaring flaws and outright lies littered here and there, she goes through and includes images of various transitional hominins and then goes on t
Was dimorphism really greater among cave lions?
Of the various aspects of cave lion biology, one claim has been in the literature for a while, and in secondhand sources as well. The statement that sexual dimorphism was greater among the cave lions, with males being 21% larger than females in mass, as opposed to the supposed 15% seen in African lions today. But was this really the case? Well, let me find out.
NOTE: I am NOT an expert in any field, these are my own findings based on my own readings.
Sexual dimorphism is quite high among the pantherines, no doubt, and the cave lion is no exception. Indeed, it was once argued by some authors that two distinct races of lion, one large and one
Featured in Groups
© 2017 - 2024 AnonymousLlama428
Comments98
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
wat